I am working on my next book about true crime and visual arts in Australia. (My first book Sculptures of Melbourne was published last year.) This has involved sitting in court, searching archives as well as, my usual activities, looking at art and talking to artists.
Melbourne, like all metropolises has artists, public art galleries, private art galleries, art collectors, art dealers and criminals, everything that is needed for art thefts. Everything that is needed for a lot of other crimes involving art and art involved in crimes.
There are many true stories about the intersection between the worlds of art and crime. I will be writing about the theft of Picasso’s Weeping Woman, of course and also other stories involving art thefts, vandalism of art, vandalism that is art and criminals who do art.
Earlier this year I spent days sitting in the Supreme Court watching the trial of Peter Gant and Aman Siddique for the forging of Brett Whiteley paintings. I learnt a lot about courtroom procedures and how Brett Whiteley’s paintings are framed.
Both Gant and Siddique have been found guilty by the jury but the judgement for that trial has still not been given, so I can’t finish that chapter just yet (both Gant and Siddique were acquitted on appeal in 2017). Coincidentally it was one of the last trials to be conducted with a judge in a wig.
A couple of weeks ago I was looking at original documents in the State Library’s Heritage Collection Reading Room. I had heard that they had the sketch book of the bushranger and sculptor, William Stanford. When I investigated I found that there were two books. They were waiting for me on the desk with the pillow on it. The pillow was to cradle the spin of the delicate old books, its cover half falling off, pages coming out. I was surprised that I was not required to wear white gloves to handle them but there was enough grim on the pages already from when Stanford was in Pentridge.
I was not allowed to take photographs of Stanford’s notebooks, nor was I allowed to photograph the tags on Supreme court’s press bench where the crime reporter have cut their names. Not that I am worried as my next book is going to be an unusual book about art, one without many pictures.
Mostly my historical research has involved searching old newspapers scanned on Trove. You would not believe the number of paint brushes stolen in Victoria in the nineteenth century but before mass production made them inexpensive. It wasn’t until the twentieth century that anyone actually stole a painting.
Readers maybe able to help me if they:
- Any serving or retired member of Victoria Police who has investigated any art theft, fraud involving art, vandalism of art or is interested in art crimes.
- Knew the painter Ronald Bull
- Has any information about Phillip Richmond O’Loughlin of Sydney from around 1946
- Has any information Timur Grin or Anthony D’Souza
- Has any information about John Allen Haywood of Mount Druitt
- Knew Ivan and Pamela Liberto in Toorak
- Taught visual arts at any prison in Victoria
- Studied visual arts in prison in Victoria
- Has a criminal conviction for graffiti in Melbourne
- Was a victims of art theft or forgery in Melbourne
- Has been arrested and/or convicted of any crime due to their art practice in Melbourne
- Was a member of the Australian Cultural Terrorists (ACT)
If you want to contact me about this or any other information about art involving crimes or crimes involving art in Australia I can keep your identity confidential.
October 9th, 2016 at 1:13 PM
Your project sounds really interesting but I’m afraid I can’t help with your questions. However, have you read ‘Cairo’ by Chris Womersley. He wrote about the theft of the Weeping Woman too. It might help. Good luck.
October 9th, 2016 at 1:53 PM
Thanks, I know about ‘Cairo’ but I haven’t read it at this stage as I want to keep the facts of the Weeping Woman case in my mind rather than confuse them with a fiction.
October 9th, 2016 at 6:24 PM
Good idea.
October 9th, 2016 at 6:36 PM
Thanks, I’m sure that I will eventually read ‘Cairo’.
October 10th, 2016 at 8:58 AM
I also found Trove very useful, but you do have to spend time, guessing what the sentences originally looked like.
October 10th, 2016 at 9:23 AM
I was trying “stolen painting”, as well as, “stolen sculpture”, but Trove would abbreviate “painting” to “paint” with with results. The word “art” did not work because it would return “articles”. So with “stolen painting” there was many more false positives but I wouldn’t have found the stories without such a crude search.
November 8th, 2016 at 10:11 AM
[…] trial with online comments risks contempt of court. I was not there for my blog but to work on my book about art and crime. I did find one exception and that was to write about the tagging on the press […]
March 15th, 2017 at 2:10 PM
[…] was research for my next book which is about true art crimes in Melbourne. For along with art theft, art forgery and art vandalism I also want to write about prison art and […]
April 10th, 2017 at 9:38 AM
[…] is some of my research for a chapter on prison art for my book about art and crime. The book is planned to be published later in the year, so I have been working on that and […]
May 3rd, 2017 at 10:32 AM
[…] is the perfect setting for a hard-bitten, true art crime writer. I need a break from working on my art crime book and writing about the art forgery convictions being quashed for The Daily Review. I haven’t had […]
July 25th, 2017 at 5:01 PM
[…] the copy editor, the book layout designer and eventually the person doing the publicity. For more clues about the content of the book see my blog post from last […]
December 18th, 2018 at 11:16 AM
[…] am still working on my book on art and crime as I have decided to expand it from Melbourne’s art crimes to Australian art crimes. I have been […]
January 24th, 2019 at 1:53 PM
[…] For more information about my investigation of art crimes see my previous blog post about my art and crime book. […]