Taken Not Given

A young woman reaches for two children. Their large hands emphasis the desire to touch. The ground is strewn with bronze garlands engraved with poetic words that further invoke the separated families. Taken Not Given is a kind of memorial, a reminder of a Parliamentary apology, and a public recognition of the hurt caused by forced adoptions.

Anne Ross Taken Not Given 2018

The sculpture is by Melbourne-based artist Anne Ross. For the last 26 years Ross has been doing public art commissions around Victoria, NSW, ACT and Hong Kong. Her figurative sculptures are generally playful fun however, for Taken Not Given, she had to reach another tone — one of an absence — of longing.

It was commissioned by the Victorian Parliament after its apology for forced adoption practices following the 2012 Commonwealth Senate Inquiry into forced adoption policies and practices. And was unveiled on 26 October 2018 on a small quiet triangle of garden on the corner of  Lansdowne St. and St Andrews Pl. beside the government buildings and opposite Fitzroy Gardens. It can be seen as you come along the street but is obscured from the corner by a large patch of plants. There was no desire line of trampled grass indicating where people had walked over the lawn to the sculpture or read the accompanying explanative panel.

Aside from looking at the aesthetic qualities and style of the sculpture and the landscape gardening when I see a new piece of public sculpture I ask: how is it being used? And, what is it intended to do?

Is this an apology cast in bronze? A solid reminder to the Victorian government not to take children from their parents again.

Or is it art-wash? Buying an indulgence from art to pay-off past sins. Is the sculpture used as a proof of their virtue for apologising and a distraction from the victims?

I’m not sure; but I’m sure that the questions are worth considering. Your answers are welcome in the comments.


About Mark Holsworth

Writer, independent researcher and artist, Mark Holsworth is the author of the book Sculptures of Melbourne. View all posts by Mark Holsworth

5 responses to “Taken Not Given

  • Lisa Hill

    I don’t think it’s art-wash. I think it was probably commissioned as a place of great value to relinquishing mothers. It’s a place, perhaps, that can be visited as others might visit a cemetery or other memorial. These mothers, if you consider it, have nowhere to go if they want to remember their lost babies, or if they want to have a private ceremony commemorating their loss. It might even, in some circumstances, be a place where reunions between mother and child could occur.
    As a matter of interest, do you know of any public art that acknowledges the Stolen Generations?

    • Mark Holsworth

      It will be interesting to see if that happens and if the location helps the area (it is quiet and accessible).
      I don’t know of any public art acknowledgement of the Stolen Generation. It is always interesting what the priorities for these memorials are.

  • Mark T

    I’m an adopted child and thought it was totally token. Money could be better spent on delivery of services to mothers who are supporting their children now in situations of domestic violence – this sculpture would have been really expensive…

  • Daniele

    Despite driving down Lansdowne Street quite often, I hadn’t noticed this sculpture until I walked by it the other day. It has a number of floral cuttings and bouquets placed on it, suggesting that it is being used as a place of commemoration.

What are your thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: